Fin by Intercom vs Pylon (2026)
Comparing Fin by Intercom and Pylon? Both are Help Desk & Ticketing tools in the directory, which is why buyers put them on the same shortlist. Below is a side-by-side look at pricing and an estimated monthly bill, channels, compliance claims, and integrations, plus when each is the better fit, so you can pick on the facts rather than either vendor's own sales page.
At a glance
| Attribute |
 Fin by Intercom
|
 Pylon
|
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Intercom's AI agent resolves customer questions instantly using your support content, and hands off to your team when it can't. | The support system for B2B companies: shared Slack channels, ticketing, and AI in one platform. |
| Pricing | Per resolution · $0.99/outcome; $49/mo minimum (includes 50 outcomes) | Paid · Custom |
| Est. monthly cost | $2,970/mo $0.99 per resolution; Resolutions, procedure handoffs, disqualifications $0.99; qualifications $9.99; minimum applies on standalone helpdesks | No published price to estimate |
| Founded | 2011 | 2022 |
| Categories | AI Agents & Chatbots Help Desk & Ticketing | B2B & Technical Support Help Desk & Ticketing |
| Channels | ||
| Chat | ✓ | ✓ |
| ✓ | ✓ | |
| Voice | ✓ | ✓ |
| SMS | ✓ | ✓ |
| ✓ | ✓ | |
| Social | ✓ | — |
| Compliance (vendor-claimed) | ||
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR | — | ✓ |
| ISO 27001 | ✓ | ✓ |
| ISO 42001 | ✓ | ✓ |
| Data residency | US, EU, Australia | US, EU |
| Languages | Dozens of languages | Not verified |
| What the AI can do | ||
| Takes actions | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hands off to a human | ✓ | ✓ |
| Choice of LLM | — | Not verified |
| Buying | ||
| Free trial | 14-day free trial | Not verified |
| How you buy | Self-serve signup | Sales-led (demo first) |
| Minimum commitment | 50 outcomes/mo minimum | Minimum 5,000 credits, minimum seat count, annual standard contract |
| Company | Acquired by Salesforce (September 2026) | Independent, venture-backed |
| Works with | Intercom Salesforce HubSpot Freshdesk Zoho Front Dixa Gorgias Sprinklr Statuspage Stripe | Slack Microsoft Teams Discord WhatsApp Telegram Salesforce HubSpot Jira Linear Notion Confluence |
| Key features |
|
|
| Next step |
Full listing Visit site → |
Full listing Visit site → |
Estimates assume 5,000 conversations a month, 60% handled by AI and 10 agent seats, at each vendor's published list price (the cost calculator's model); treat them as a floor, not a quote. Compliance rows are what vendors publicly claim, and “Not verified” means we have not confirmed that fact yet, not that the tool lacks it.
Choose Fin by Intercom or Pylon?
Choose Fin by Intercom if
Best for: Teams that want to pay only for resolved questions, at $0.99 per outcome with a 14-day trial and a self-serve start, whether they run Intercom or keep Zendesk, Salesforce, HubSpot or another help desk underneath, with US, EU or Australian hosting and SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001 coverage.
- you need autonomous AI agents
- you need Social coverage
- you would rather pay per resolved ticket than per seat
Look elsewhere if you want a predictable flat bill: the per-outcome model with a 50-outcome monthly minimum means a good month costs more. Also weigh the September 2026 Salesforce acquisition when you need roadmap certainty.
Choose Pylon if
Best for: B2B companies whose customers live in shared Slack Connect and Teams channels and want those threads tracked as tickets with SLAs, AI answers in-channel, email and chat alongside, account health signals, US or EU hosting and SOC 2 coverage.
- you need B2B and technical support
- you need a vendor that publicly claims GDPR
- you prefer a flat subscription to usage-based billing
Look elsewhere if you run consumer support, want a free plan or a self-serve start, or need to see prices first: Pylon is quote-led, has no free tier, sells AI as add-ons with per-resolution components, and carries seat minimums on Enterprise.
About Fin by Intercom
Fin is Intercom's AI agent, and it has quietly become the product the whole company rallies around. It runs on the same platform as Intercom's inbox, help center, and messenger, so it already knows your customers before it says a word. Point it at your help articles and past conversations and it starts answering questions instantly across chat, email, SMS, and WhatsApp, taking real actions through your integrations and escalating to a human with full context when a question genuinely needs one.
The thing that made Fin famous is how it is billed. Instead of charging per seat or per conversation, Intercom charges roughly a dollar for every question Fin actually resolves, so you only pay when the robot earns its keep. That pay-for-outcomes model was unusual when Fin launched and has since become the template half the industry copies.
Intercom was founded in 2011 by four friends from Dublin, and it spent a decade building the messaging tools Fin now sits on top of. Fin does not insist you live inside Intercom, either. Its platform version bolts the same agent onto other help desks like Zendesk and Salesforce, so teams can keep their existing ticketing setup and still hand the easy questions to AI. It ships with simulation testing, analytics, and tunable tone controls so you can rehearse answers on historical tickets before flipping the switch on real customers.
In 2026 the company renamed itself Fin after this agent, and Salesforce completed its acquisition of Fin, formerly Intercom, on September 10, 2026. Fin keeps selling on its own and on top of other help desks, but buyers on a competing CRM should ask how the roadmap changes under Salesforce.
For buyers, Fin is the safe, well-documented default: enormous scale, a public per-resolution price you can model on a spreadsheet, and a product that resolves millions of conversations every week for companies of every size. If you want an AI agent that is proven, measurable, quick to pilot, and easy to justify to a finance team that wants a number, Fin is usually the first name on the shortlist and rarely a regrettable one.
Read the full Fin by Intercom listing → · See Fin by Intercom alternatives →
About Pylon
Pylon is what a help desk looks like when you start from Slack instead of email. Founded in late 2022 by Advith Chelikani, Marty Kausas, and Robert Eng through Y Combinator, it noticed that modern B2B support had quietly moved into shared Slack Connect and Teams channels, where traditional ticketing systems are blind. Pylon makes those channels first-class support surfaces: threads become tracked issues with owners and SLAs, AI answers routine questions in-channel from your docs and past conversations, and everything rolls up into proper reporting alongside email and in-app chat.
The company has grown at a pace that turned heads, reporting five-fold-plus revenue growth in consecutive years, over a thousand B2B customers including Together AI, Cognition, Temporal, AssemblyAI, and HackerRank, and a $31 million Series B co-led by Andreessen Horowitz and Bain Capital Ventures in 2025, bringing total funding to $51 million. Its positioning has sharpened into "the agentic support platform" for B2B, with a family of named AI agents, Support, Assist, Background, and Slack, plus account intelligence that surfaces health signals across every customer conversation.
Pricing starts at $59 per seat per month billed annually, with AI capabilities sold as add-ons, including a per-resolved-ticket component for the autonomous agents; there is no free plan, and Enterprise carries seat minimums.
Pylon is the obvious shortlist item for post-sales teams at B2B software companies, especially where customers already live in shared Slack channels and the support, success, and solutions functions blur together. If your support is consumer email and chat volume, the e-commerce and SMB tools in this directory will fit better.
Read the full Pylon listing → · See Pylon alternatives →
Know when Fin by Intercom or Pylon changes
One plain-text email at the start of each month with every verified price change, acquisition and new listing across the directory, including any change to Fin by Intercom or Pylon. No tracking pixels, unsubscribe in one click.