Comparing Capacity and Fin by Intercom? Both are AI Agents & Chatbots and Help Desk & Ticketing tools in the directory, which is why buyers put them on the same shortlist. Below is a side-by-side look at pricing and an estimated monthly bill, channels, compliance claims, and integrations, plus when each is the better fit, so you can pick on the facts rather than either vendor's own sales page.
| Attribute |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered support automation platform: helpdesk, knowledge base, and chatbots that answer from everywhere. | Intercom's AI agent resolves customer questions instantly using your support content, and hands off to your team when it can't. |
| Pricing | Paid · Custom | Per resolution · $0.99/outcome; $49/mo minimum (includes 50 outcomes) |
| Est. monthly cost | No published price to estimate | $2,970/mo $0.99 per resolution; Resolutions, procedure handoffs, disqualifications $0.99; qualifications $9.99; minimum applies on standalone helpdesks |
| Founded | 2017 | 2011 |
| Categories | AI Agents & Chatbots Help Desk & Ticketing Knowledge Base & Self-Service | AI Agents & Chatbots Help Desk & Ticketing |
| Channels | ||
| Chat | ✓ | ✓ |
| ✓ | ✓ | |
| Voice | ✓ | ✓ |
| SMS | ✓ | ✓ |
| — | ✓ | |
| Social | — | ✓ |
| Compliance (vendor-claimed) | ||
| SOC 2 | ✓ | ✓ |
| HIPAA | ✓ | ✓ |
| GDPR | ✓ | — |
| ISO 27001 | — | ✓ |
| ISO 42001 | — | ✓ |
| Data residency | Not verified | US, EU, Australia |
| Languages | 30 languages (voice agent) | Dozens of languages |
| What the AI can do | ||
| Takes actions | ✓ | ✓ |
| Hands off to a human | ✓ | ✓ |
| Choice of LLM | Not verified | — |
| Buying | ||
| Free trial | Not verified | 14-day free trial |
| How you buy | Sales-led (demo first) | Self-serve signup |
| Minimum commitment | Annual contract (platform subscription) | 50 outcomes/mo minimum |
| Company | Independent, venture-backed | Acquired by Salesforce (September 2026) |
| Works with | Salesforce Zendesk ServiceNow Slack Microsoft Teams Genesys | Intercom Salesforce HubSpot Freshdesk Zoho Front Dixa Gorgias Sprinklr Statuspage Stripe |
| Key features |
|
|
| Next step |
Full listing Visit site → |
Full listing Visit site → |
Estimates assume 5,000 conversations a month, 60% handled by AI and 10 agent seats, at each vendor's published list price (the cost calculator's model); treat them as a floor, not a quote. Compliance rows are what vendors publicly claim, and “Not verified” means we have not confirmed that fact yet, not that the tool lacks it.
Best for: Organizations that want customer support and internal help desk automation from one vendor, across chat, voice, SMS and email, with agent assist, auto-QA and knowledge orchestration included, on Salesforce, Zendesk, ServiceNow, Slack or Genesys, with SOC 2, HIPAA and GDPR coverage.
Look elsewhere if you want to see a price before talking to sales: Capacity bills an annual platform fee plus usage and publishes no figures. Teams that only need a chat agent will be buying a much broader platform than they use.
Best for: Teams that want to pay only for resolved questions, at $0.99 per outcome with a 14-day trial and a self-serve start, whether they run Intercom or keep Zendesk, Salesforce, HubSpot or another help desk underneath, with US, EU or Australian hosting and SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 27001 and ISO 42001 coverage.
Look elsewhere if you want a predictable flat bill: the per-outcome model with a 50-outcome monthly minimum means a good month costs more. Also weigh the September 2026 Salesforce acquisition when you need roadmap certainty.
Capacity is the consolidator of this category. Founded in St. Louis in 2017 by David Karandish and Chris Sims after Karandish's roughly $900 million exit as CEO of Answers.com, it has grown as much by acquisition as by code: eleven companies and counting, including Lucy, Linc, Textel, SmartAction, and in 2025 Call Criteria and Barcelona's Verbio Technologies. Each deal added a capability, and the result is a genuinely broad CX automation platform: AI agents across chat, voice, SMS, and email, real-time agent assist, automated QA and conversation intelligence, outbound campaigns, and a knowledge orchestration layer that answers from documents and apps across your stack.
The same platform serves customer support and internal helpdesk use cases, which suits organizations tired of buying those separately, and it automates workflows across integrations with Salesforce, Zendesk, ServiceNow, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Genesys, and many more. The company says it is profitable, past $60 million in annual recurring revenue, with over 20,000 organizations on the platform; 2025 brought another $92 million in funding to keep the acquisition engine running.
Pricing is a hybrid: an annual platform fee in three tiers plus usage, per response for chat and email, per minute for voice, per message for SMS. No dollar figures are published, so budget for a sales conversation.
Capacity fits buyers who want one throat to choke: a mid-size or larger organization consolidating support automation, internal helpdesk, and contact-center AI into a single vendor. Teams that prefer sharp best-of-breed point tools may find it broad rather than deep in places, but as a platform bet it is one of the more complete in the directory.
Read the full Capacity listing → · See Capacity alternatives →
Fin is Intercom's AI agent, and it has quietly become the product the whole company rallies around. It runs on the same platform as Intercom's inbox, help center, and messenger, so it already knows your customers before it says a word. Point it at your help articles and past conversations and it starts answering questions instantly across chat, email, SMS, and WhatsApp, taking real actions through your integrations and escalating to a human with full context when a question genuinely needs one.
The thing that made Fin famous is how it is billed. Instead of charging per seat or per conversation, Intercom charges roughly a dollar for every question Fin actually resolves, so you only pay when the robot earns its keep. That pay-for-outcomes model was unusual when Fin launched and has since become the template half the industry copies.
Intercom was founded in 2011 by four friends from Dublin, and it spent a decade building the messaging tools Fin now sits on top of. Fin does not insist you live inside Intercom, either. Its platform version bolts the same agent onto other help desks like Zendesk and Salesforce, so teams can keep their existing ticketing setup and still hand the easy questions to AI. It ships with simulation testing, analytics, and tunable tone controls so you can rehearse answers on historical tickets before flipping the switch on real customers.
In 2026 the company renamed itself Fin after this agent, and Salesforce completed its acquisition of Fin, formerly Intercom, on September 10, 2026. Fin keeps selling on its own and on top of other help desks, but buyers on a competing CRM should ask how the roadmap changes under Salesforce.
For buyers, Fin is the safe, well-documented default: enormous scale, a public per-resolution price you can model on a spreadsheet, and a product that resolves millions of conversations every week for companies of every size. If you want an AI agent that is proven, measurable, quick to pilot, and easy to justify to a finance team that wants a number, Fin is usually the first name on the shortlist and rarely a regrettable one.
Read the full Fin by Intercom listing → · See Fin by Intercom alternatives →
One plain-text email at the start of each month with every verified price change, acquisition and new listing across the directory, including any change to Capacity or Fin by Intercom. No tracking pixels, unsubscribe in one click.
Submit your AI customer support software to get listed alongside these tools and show up in head-to-head comparisons.