Comparing Balto and EvaluAgent? Both are Contact Center & CCaaS and Voice & Phone AI tools in the directory, which is why buyers put them on the same shortlist. Below is a side-by-side look at how they price, what they integrate with, and when each is the better fit, so you can pick on the facts rather than either vendor's own sales page.
| Attribute | Balto | EvaluAgent |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Paid · Custom | Paid · $35/user/mo |
| Founded | 2017 | 2012 |
| Categories | Agent Assist & Copilots Contact Center & CCaaS Voice & Phone AI | Contact Center & CCaaS QA & Conversation Analytics Voice & Phone AI |
| Integrations | Five9 Genesys Cloud NICE CXone RingCentral 8x8 Salesforce | Zendesk Intercom Salesforce Service Cloud Freshdesk Genesys Five9 Amazon Connect Talkdesk |
Balto puts the right words on the agent's screen while the call is still happening. Founded in 2017 in St. Louis by Marc Bernstein and Chris Kontes, it pioneered real-time guidance for contact centers: dynamic checklists, objection responses, and compliance language that appear mid-conversation, exactly when needed, rather than in a coaching session three weeks later. In industries like collections, insurance, healthcare, and home services, where certain sentences are legally required and certain mistakes are expensive, that immediacy is the whole product.
The platform has grown around that core into real-time QA that scores every call as it happens, AI coaching that spots which behaviors need work, live compliance monitoring with manager alerts, and Togo, Balto's voice AI agents for the repetitive calls, like scheduling and account verification, that never needed a human. It integrates with the major contact-center platforms, including Five9, Genesys Cloud, NICE CXone, RingCentral, and 8x8.
Balto raised a $37.5 million Series B led by Stripes in 2021, with RingCentral's venture arm participating, bringing total funding to roughly $52 million, and remains one of the flagship companies of the St. Louis tech scene, with customers like Humana, GEHA, Nelnet, NewRez, and Staples Canada. Pricing is quote-based; there is no public price list.
Choose Balto when what is said on live calls carries real regulatory or revenue weight. Pure digital-support teams will find better fits elsewhere in this directory, but if your operation runs on phone conversations where compliance phrasing and in-the-moment guidance decide outcomes, Balto's real-time focus is still the sharpest in the category.
Read the full Balto listing → · See Balto alternatives →
EvaluAgent is quality assurance and performance improvement software for contact centers. Its AutoQM engine automatically scores every conversation across voice, email, and chat instead of the tiny samples manual QA allows, with voice transcription built in, custom scorecards, and coaching workflows that route findings back to agents. A conversation intelligence tier adds intent detection, summarization, sentiment analytics, and predictive metrics, and a newer product line applies the same independent quality scoring to AI agents, priced per conversation rather than per seat.
The company was founded in 2012 in Middlesbrough in the north of England by Jaime Scott, Alex Richards, and Michelle Dinsmore, and built steadily for a decade before taking outside growth capital: a $20 million round in June 2023 from PeakSpan Capital, covered by TechCrunch as a bet that evaluating agents, human or otherwise, becomes more important as automation spreads. It remains one of the more prominent UK-grown players in the QA space.
Pricing is refreshingly public for this category. AutoQM starts at $35 per user per month, the AutoQM plus Conversation Intelligence bundle starts at $65 per user per month, and QA for AI agents starts at $0.05 per conversation, or $0.13 with conversation intelligence included. Volume discounts apply, AI agent pricing sits on top of a seat tier, and larger deployments still end in a custom quote, but you can budget from the website, which few competitors allow.
Choose EvaluAgent if you run a voice-heavy or omnichannel contact center, want QA plus coaching in one system, and appreciate a vendor that publishes numbers. It is a strong fit for UK and European operations and for teams starting to QA their chatbots. Look elsewhere if you want a free tier for a tiny team, or if you need the massive integration catalog and warehouse tooling of a MaestroQA.
Read the full EvaluAgent listing → · See EvaluAgent alternatives →
Submit your AI customer support software to get listed alongside these tools and show up in head-to-head comparisons.